BBZ, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 1207 (09 September 2025)
The applicant raised no properly arguable ground of appeal that casts doubt on the safety of the conviction; the fresh evidence sought to be introduced was not relevant or credible; and the application was wholly unmeritorious, justifying a loss of time order.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] EWCA Crim 1207
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Applicant/defendant: BBZ
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 September 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction and Related Orders
- Outcome
- renewed application for leave to appeal against conviction refused; all other applications dismissed; loss of time order made
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Offences, Rape, Indecent Assault, Indecency With a Child, Appeal Against Conviction, Fresh Evidence, Loss of Time Order, Anonymity Order
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
BBZ
Applicant/defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction and Related Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has raised any arguable ground of appeal against conviction
- 2 Whether fresh evidence should be admitted under section 23 of the Criminal Appeal Act 1968
- 3 Whether a loss of time order should be made
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant raised no properly arguable ground of appeal that casts doubt on the safety of the conviction; the fresh evidence sought to be introduced was not relevant or credible; and the application was wholly unmeritorious, justifying a loss of time order.
Court Disposition
renewed application for leave to appeal against conviction refused; all other applications dismissed; loss of time order made
Orders
- 28 days shall not count towards the sentence as a loss of time order
- applicant to be anonymised as BBZ in all publications
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment