EDC, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 1428 (10 October 2025)
The judge's rulings on the admissibility of hearsay evidence and refusal to stay the proceedings were soundly based on the relevant law. The absence of documentary records did not render the trial unfair, and the applicant had the opportunity to challenge the evidence. The proposed grounds of appeal were not arguable.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] EWCA Crim 1428
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Applicant/defendant: EDC
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 October 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- application for leave to appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Offences, Hearsay Evidence, Abuse of Process, Historical Allegations
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
EDC
Applicant/defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judge erred in admitting hearsay evidence from a deceased complainant under section 116 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003
- 2 Whether the judge erred in refusing to stay the proceedings as an abuse of process due to the historical nature of the allegations and absence of records
Ratio Decidendi
The judge's rulings on the admissibility of hearsay evidence and refusal to stay the proceedings were soundly based on the relevant law. The absence of documentary records did not render the trial unfair, and the applicant had the opportunity to challenge the evidence. The proposed grounds of appeal were not arguable.
Court Disposition
application for leave to appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment