Colt Technology Services v SG Global Group SRL
Permission to appeal is refused as none of the proposed grounds have a real prospect of success and there is no compelling reason for an appeal. The stay of enforcement is refused due to lack of evidence of hardship and the absence of grounds to exercise discretion.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: Colt Technology Services; Defendant: SG Global Group SRL
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 June 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Application for Permission to Appeal and Stay of Enforcement of Costs Order
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal refused; stay of enforcement refused; order for costs to be enforced as per Colt UK's draft with minor amendments.
- Legal Topics
- Permission to Appeal, Stay of Execution, Contractual Notification, Illegality in Contract
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Colt Technology Services
Claimant
SG Global Group SRL
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application for Permission to Appeal and Stay of Enforcement of Costs Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether permission to appeal should be granted
- 2 Whether a stay of enforcement of the costs order should be granted
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to appeal is refused as none of the proposed grounds have a real prospect of success and there is no compelling reason for an appeal. The stay of enforcement is refused due to lack of evidence of hardship and the absence of grounds to exercise discretion.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal refused; stay of enforcement refused; order for costs to be enforced as per Colt UK's draft with minor amendments.
Orders
- Permission to appeal is refused.
- Stay of enforcement of costs order is refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment