JMK, Re [2018] EWCOP 5 (13 March 2018)

JMK, Re [2018] EWCOP 5 (13 March 2018)

A Canadian Continuing Power of Attorney that has not been approved or made by a foreign court and is not subject to a system of registration does not constitute a 'protective measure' for the purposes of recognition under Schedule 3 of the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

Citation
[2018] EWCOP 5
Parties
Applicant: SH; Applicant: PH; Subject: JMK
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
13 March 2018
Procedural Posture
Application for Recognition of Foreign Power of Attorney / Judgment After Reconsideration of Dismissal Order
Outcome
Application dismissed; previous dismissal order stands.
Legal Topics
Recognition of Foreign Protective Measures, Power of Attorney, Schedule 3 Mental Capacity Act 2005

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

SH

Applicant

PH

Applicant

JMK

Subject

Procedural Posture

Application for Recognition of Foreign Power of Attorney / Judgment After Reconsideration of Dismissal Order

  1. 1 Whether a Canadian Continuing Power of Attorney constitutes a 'protective measure' under Schedule 3 of the Mental Capacity Act 2005

Ratio Decidendi

A Canadian Continuing Power of Attorney that has not been approved or made by a foreign court and is not subject to a system of registration does not constitute a 'protective measure' for the purposes of recognition under Schedule 3 of the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed; previous dismissal order stands.

Orders

  • Recognition of the Canadian Continuing Power of Attorney as a protective measure is refused.
  • Applicants may apply to be appointed as property and affairs deputies in this jurisdiction.