Bank of Credit & Commerce International SA & Anor v Saadi & Anor [2005] EWHC 2256 (QB) (12 October 2005)

Bank of Credit & Commerce International SA & Anor v Saadi & Anor [2005] EWHC 2256 (QB) (12 October 2005)

Mr. Saadi, as an account manager and signatory, was a constructive trustee and owed fiduciary duties over the relevant accounts. The evidence established his active participation or knowing acquiescence in the ACU fraud, resulting in misappropriation of £3,174,215.68. No limitation period applied due to Section 21(1)(a) of the Limitation Act 1980. BCCI was entitled to summary judgment for the misappropriated sum, compound interest, and costs.

Citation
[2005] EWHC 2256 (QB)
Parties
Claimant: Bank of Credit & Commerce International SA (in compulsory liquidation); Claimant: Bank of Credit & Commerce International (Overseas) Limited (in liquidation); Defendant: Shahabuddin Saadi; Defendant: Asifa Saadi
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
12 October 2005
Procedural Posture
Civil Summary Judgment Application / Summary Judgment Application Under CPR Part 24
Outcome
Summary judgment granted for the claimants against the first defendant.
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Constructive Trust, Fraudulent Misappropriation, Limitation Period Under Section 21 Limitation Act 1980, Compound Interest on Breach of Trust

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bank of Credit & Commerce International SA (in compulsory liquidation)

Claimant

Bank of Credit & Commerce International (Overseas) Limited (in liquidation)

Claimant

Shahabuddin Saadi

Defendant

Asifa Saadi

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Summary Judgment Application / Summary Judgment Application Under CPR Part 24

  1. 1 Whether Mr. Saadi was liable for breach of trust and fiduciary duty in relation to misappropriated funds from BCCI
  2. 2 Whether summary judgment should be granted against Mr. Saadi under CPR Part 24
  3. 3 Whether any limitation period applies to the claim under Section 21 of the Limitation Act 1980

Ratio Decidendi

Mr. Saadi, as an account manager and signatory, was a constructive trustee and owed fiduciary duties over the relevant accounts. The evidence established his active participation or knowing acquiescence in the ACU fraud, resulting in misappropriation of £3,174,215.68. No limitation period applied due to Section 21(1)(a) of the Limitation Act 1980. BCCI was entitled to summary judgment for the misappropriated sum, compound interest, and costs.

Court Disposition

Summary judgment granted for the claimants against the first defendant.

Orders

  • Judgment for £3,174,215.68 against the first defendant.
  • Interest awarded in the sum of £14,746,130.87.