R v Shahnur Rahman
The Recorder correctly applied the Sentencing Council Guideline, properly characterised the offending, and gave appropriate consideration to aggravating and mitigating factors and reduction for attempt; the sentences were not manifestly excessive and the grounds of appeal were not arguable.
- Parties
- Applicant: Shahnur Rahman; Applicant: Ridwanur Rahman; Respondent: Rex
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 May 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- applications for extension of time and leave to appeal against sentence refused
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Attempted Grievous Bodily Harm, Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shahnur Rahman
Applicant
Ridwanur Rahman
Applicant
Rex
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Recorder erred in categorising the offending as culpability A under the Sentencing Guidelines
- 2 Whether there was an abuse of power and revenge attack
- 3 Whether sufficient mitigation and reduction for attempt was applied
Ratio Decidendi
The Recorder correctly applied the Sentencing Council Guideline, properly characterised the offending, and gave appropriate consideration to aggravating and mitigating factors and reduction for attempt; the sentences were not manifestly excessive and the grounds of appeal were not arguable.
Court Disposition
applications for extension of time and leave to appeal against sentence refused
Orders
- applications for extension of time refused
- applications for leave to appeal against sentence refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment