Waterside Finance Ltd & Ors v Karim

The court cannot assess whether there is any arguable point in the grounds of appeal without having all the material that was before the judge at first instance.

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Respondents: Waterside Finance Limited and Others; Applicant: Shamin Akhtar Karim
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Judgment Date: 03 October 2013
Procedural Posture: Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal
Outcome: Application adjourned
Legal Topics: Sale of Property, Registration of Title, Appeal Procedure

Property Law Sale of Property Registration of Title Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Waterside Finance Limited and Others

Respondents

Shamin Akhtar Karim

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal

Legal Issues

1 Whether the order of Asplin J was wrong regarding the registration of property title
2 Whether there was any arguable point in the grounds of appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The court cannot assess whether there is any arguable point in the grounds of appeal without having all the material that was before the judge at first instance.

Court Disposition

Application adjourned

Orders

Application adjourned to the first convenient date after 17 October 2013
Applicant to lodge with the Civil Appeals Office copies of the bundles and witness statements that were before Asplin J, and a transcript of the proceedings

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.