Stott, R v [2017] EWCA Crim 370 (24 February 2017)
The extended sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive; the finding of dangerousness was justified based on repeated serious sexual offending against vulnerable young girls and the appellant's inability to control his behaviour; the sentence on count 9 exceeded the statutory maximum and was reduced accordingly.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] EWCA Crim 370
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Appellant: Shane Michael Stott
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 February 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Offences, Sentencing, Dangerousness, Extended Sentence, Young Offenders, Totality Principle
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Shane Michael Stott
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the extended sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether the finding of dangerousness was justified
- 3 Whether the sentence on count 9 exceeded statutory maximum
Ratio Decidendi
The extended sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive; the finding of dangerousness was justified based on repeated serious sexual offending against vulnerable young girls and the appellant's inability to control his behaviour; the sentence on count 9 exceeded the statutory maximum and was reduced accordingly.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Sentence of eight months' detention on count 9 quashed and substituted with four months' detention
- All other sentences remain unaltered
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment