Williams, R (On the Application Of) v Caerphilly County Borough Council
The adoption of the Strategy was a broad policy decision not committing the council to specific expenditure or closure, and thus was within the cabinet's powers; neither detailed financial consideration nor statutory consultation under section 2 and 5 of the 2009 Measure was required at this stage.
- Parties
- Appellant: Shane Williams; Respondent: Caerphilly County Borough Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 March 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Cabinet Vs Full Council Powers, Statutory Interpretation, Public Sector Equality Duty, Consultation Requirements, Local Government (wales) Measure 2009, Local Government Act 2000
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shane Williams
Appellant
Caerphilly County Borough Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether adoption of the Strategy was reserved to full council or cabinet
- 2 Whether cabinet failed to consider cost as a material consideration
- 3 Whether adoption of the Strategy triggered consultation obligations under section 2 and 5 of the Local Government (Wales) Measure 2009
Ratio Decidendi
The adoption of the Strategy was a broad policy decision not committing the council to specific expenditure or closure, and thus was within the cabinet's powers; neither detailed financial consideration nor statutory consultation under section 2 and 5 of the 2009 Measure was required at this stage.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appellant's appeal dismissed
- Appellant to pay Respondent's costs as determined under Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment