Cumberbatch & Anor, R. v [2021] EWCA Crim 918 (09 June 2021)
The sentences imposed were not manifestly excessive; the judge was entitled to categorise the offences as high culpability and dangerousness based on the evidence, aggravating features, and criminal histories. The findings were consistent with jury verdicts and sentencing guidelines.
- Citation
- [2021] EWCA Crim 918
- Parties
- Applicant: Shaquille Michael Cumberbatch; Applicant: Christopher Connor Carrington; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 June 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Applications for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Legal Topics
- Robbery, Manslaughter, Sentencing, Dangerousness, Extended Sentence, Totality, Culpability, Use of Weapons
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shaquille Michael Cumberbatch
Applicant
Christopher Connor Carrington
Applicant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Applications for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentences imposed on Cumberbatch and Carrington were manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether the categorisation of the offences under the Sentencing Council Guidelines was correct
- 3 Whether the judge's findings regarding culpability and dangerousness were justified
Ratio Decidendi
The sentences imposed were not manifestly excessive; the judge was entitled to categorise the offences as high culpability and dangerousness based on the evidence, aggravating features, and criminal histories. The findings were consistent with jury verdicts and sentencing guidelines.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment