R v Shaquille Williams
The judge was correct to categorise the offence as Category 1 harm due to risk of serious disorder, but not solely because the Trafford Centre is a place where vulnerable people are likely to be present. The sentence imposed was appropriate given the facts, previous conviction, commission while on bail, and habitual knife carrying. Suspension was properly refused due to lack of rehabilitation prospect and risk to public.
- Parties
- Applicant: Shaquille Williams; Respondent: Rex
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 July 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Possession of Bladed Article, Guideline Categorisation, Suspension of Sentence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shaquille Williams
Applicant
Rex
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the offence was correctly categorised as Category A1 under sentencing guidelines
- 2 Whether the risk of serious disorder and presence of vulnerable people justified Category 1 harm
- 3 Whether the sentence could be suspended given risk and rehabilitation prospects
Ratio Decidendi
The judge was correct to categorise the offence as Category 1 harm due to risk of serious disorder, but not solely because the Trafford Centre is a place where vulnerable people are likely to be present. The sentence imposed was appropriate given the facts, previous conviction, commission while on bail, and habitual knife carrying. Suspension was properly refused due to lack of rehabilitation prospect and risk to public.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Leave to appeal granted
- Appeal against sentence dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment