MccArthy v Mccarthy & Stone Plc
Rule 4.4 of the Company Share Option Plan requires a two-stage process: the Remuneration Committee has absolute discretion to determine whether the option is exercisable, but if so, the proportion exercisable must be determined solely by reference to the extent to which the Performance Condition has been achieved. Where the Performance Condition is fully achieved, the only permissible outcome is that the option is exercisable in full. The Committee's determination to allow only 75% was invalid. The company is entitled to reimbursement for income tax and National Insurance paid on the claimant's behalf, as these were the claimant's liabilities discharged by the company under compulsion of...
- Parties
- Appellant/claimant: John McCarthy; Respondent/defendant: McCarthy & Stone PLC
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 July 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part, cross-appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Share Options, Remuneration Committee Discretion, Restitution for Money Paid, Tax and National Insurance Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John McCarthy
Appellant/claimant
McCarthy & Stone PLC
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Proper construction of Rule 4.4 of the Company Share Option Plan
- 2 Whether the Remuneration Committee's determination was valid
- 3 Entitlement to exercise share options in full
Ratio Decidendi
Rule 4.4 of the Company Share Option Plan requires a two-stage process: the Remuneration Committee has absolute discretion to determine whether the option is exercisable, but if so, the proportion exercisable must be determined solely by reference to the extent to which the Performance Condition has been achieved. Where the Performance Condition is fully achieved, the only permissible outcome is that the option is exercisable in full. The Committee's determination to allow only 75% was invalid. The company is entitled to reimbursement for income tax and National Insurance paid on the claimant's behalf, as these were the claimant's liabilities discharged by the company under compulsion of...
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part, cross-appeal dismissed
Orders
- Paragraphs 1 and 2 of the High Court order set aside; declaration granted that claimant was entitled to exercise the option in full prior to the takeover
- Appeal against summary judgment on the counterclaim dismissed; company entitled to reimbursement of £197,931.33
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment