R v Shaun Hall

R v Shaun Hall

The sentencing judge was entitled to categorise the offence as culpability B due to the obvious risk of serious harm created by the applicant's actions, and after balancing aggravating and mitigating factors, the sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive. The consecutive sentence for burglary was justified and appropriately reduced for totality.

Parties
Applicant: Shaun Hall; Respondent: Rex
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 September 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
renewed application for leave to appeal against sentence refused
Legal Topics
Manslaughter, Burglary, Sentencing, Appeals
Criminal Law Manslaughter Burglary Sentencing Appeals

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Shaun Hall

Applicant

Rex

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentencing judge erred in categorising the manslaughter as culpability B under the sentencing guidelines
  2. 2 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
  3. 3 Whether sufficient weight was given to mitigating factors

Ratio Decidendi

The sentencing judge was entitled to categorise the offence as culpability B due to the obvious risk of serious harm created by the applicant's actions, and after balancing aggravating and mitigating factors, the sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive. The consecutive sentence for burglary was justified and appropriately reduced for totality.

Court Disposition

renewed application for leave to appeal against sentence refused