Barclays Bank UK Plc v Shaun Richard Terry & Anor
The mistaken discharge of charges should be rescinded and the Land Registry rectified as sought, with the claimant entitled to priority where claimed, and the orders do not constitute a 'disposition' triggering restrictions under the Land Registration Act 2002.
- Parties
- Claimant: Barclays Bank UK Plc; Defendant: Shaun Richard Terry; Defendant: Rachael Jayne Terry
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Summary Judgment and Consequential Orders
- Outcome
- Orders granted as sought and agreed by the defendants.
- Legal Topics
- Mistaken Discharge of Charges, Land Registration, Priority of Interests, Rectification of Register
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Barclays Bank UK Plc
Claimant
Shaun Richard Terry
Defendant
Rachael Jayne Terry
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Summary Judgment and Consequential Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the mistaken discharge of charges should be rescinded and the Land Registry rectified
- 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to priority over third party interests
- 3 Whether service on owners and interested parties was satisfactory
Ratio Decidendi
The mistaken discharge of charges should be rescinded and the Land Registry rectified as sought, with the claimant entitled to priority where claimed, and the orders do not constitute a 'disposition' triggering restrictions under the Land Registration Act 2002.
Court Disposition
Orders granted as sought and agreed by the defendants.
Orders
- Rescission of mistaken discharges of charges on Part 3 properties.
- Rectification of the Land Registry to show charges as subsisting.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment