National Crime Agency v Doherty
The court held that the NCA had made reasonable efforts to serve the defendant and that alternative service at the two identified addresses was justified and should be deemed good service. The court further held that there was sufficient evidence to support a prima facie case that the property was obtained through unlawful conduct, thus satisfying the conditions for granting a property freezing order.
- Parties
- Claimant: National Crime Agency; Defendant: Shawn Martin Doherty
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 June 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Interlocutory Application for Property Freezing Order
- Outcome
- application granted
- Legal Topics
- Proceeds of Crime, Property Freezing Order, Service of Process, Unlawful Conduct, Recoverable Property
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Crime Agency
Claimant
Shawn Martin Doherty
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Interlocutory Application for Property Freezing Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether alternative service of the application on the defendant is valid
- 2 Whether the conditions for granting a property freezing order under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 are met
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the NCA had made reasonable efforts to serve the defendant and that alternative service at the two identified addresses was justified and should be deemed good service. The court further held that there was sufficient evidence to support a prima facie case that the property was obtained through unlawful conduct, thus satisfying the conditions for granting a property freezing order.
Court Disposition
application granted
Orders
- Property Freezing Order granted in terms of the draft provided by the claimant
- Service of the application and future documents to be effected by alternative method at the two specified addresses
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment