R v Shea Williams
The bad character evidence relating to gang affiliation was properly admitted as relevant to identification, and the trial judge's directions adequately addressed any risk of prejudice; the conviction is safe given the strong circumstantial evidence.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: Shea Williams; Co Defendant: Anthony Wabali; Co Defendant: Jerome Manning
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 May 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Bad Character Evidence, Gang Affiliation, Identification, Joint Enterprise, Firearms Offences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Shea Williams
Applicant
Anthony Wabali
Co Defendant
Jerome Manning
Co Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge wrongly admitted bad character evidence relating to gang affiliation
- 2 Whether the admission of such evidence rendered the conviction unsafe
Ratio Decidendi
The bad character evidence relating to gang affiliation was properly admitted as relevant to identification, and the trial judge's directions adequately addressed any risk of prejudice; the conviction is safe given the strong circumstantial evidence.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- renewed application for leave to appeal against conviction is refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment