T & Ors, R (on the application of) v Sheffield City Council
The defendant's decision to cease subsidies to twenty nurseries was reached following a thorough and compliant consultation process, with proper consideration of equality, best value, and statutory duties, and was not irrational; therefore, the challenge fails on all grounds.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: R (T and Others); Defendant: Sheffield City Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 October 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Consultation, Public Sector Equality Duty, Best Value Duty, Childcare Act 2006, Irrationality
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R (T and Others)
Claimant
Sheffield City Council
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the consultation process was fair and compliant with common law standards
- 2 Whether the defendant complied with the public sector equality duty under section 149 of the Equality Act 2010
- 3 Whether the defendant breached its best value duty under section 3 of the Local Government Act 1999
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant's decision to cease subsidies to twenty nurseries was reached following a thorough and compliant consultation process, with proper consideration of equality, best value, and statutory duties, and was not irrational; therefore, the challenge fails on all grounds.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- The challenge to the defendant's decision fails on all grounds.
- No relief is granted to the claimants.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment