R v Sheldon Sieudath
The application for permission to appeal is arguable only in relation to the judge's interventions during the evidence of the applicant and his wife, which may have crossed the line into unfairness; other grounds relating to collusion and cross-admissibility are unarguable due to lack of evidence and proper directions.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Rex; Applicant: Sheldon Sieudath
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 December 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Offences, Judicial Interventions, Cross Admissibility, Collusion, Fair Trial
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecutor
Sheldon Sieudath
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge's interventions rendered the trial unfair
- 2 Whether the judge's summing-up withdrew the issue of collusion from the jury
- 3 Whether the direction on cross-admissibility was deficient
Ratio Decidendi
The application for permission to appeal is arguable only in relation to the judge's interventions during the evidence of the applicant and his wife, which may have crossed the line into unfairness; other grounds relating to collusion and cross-admissibility are unarguable due to lack of evidence and proper directions.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal granted in part
Orders
- Audio file of the oral evidence of the applicant and his wife to be made available to the Full Court
- Applicant's counsel to refine submissions on judicial interventions
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment