Mann v Mann
The respondent has the means to pay the outstanding sums and is in wilful default; the court has jurisdiction to make and re-characterise orders for payment; enforcement measures including imprisonment and sequestration are justified.
- Parties
- Applicant: Shelley Mann; Respondent: David Mann
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 June 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Family / Enforcement Proceedings Post Divorce, Multiple Hearings and Appeals
- Outcome
- Orders for payment upheld; enforcement proceedings to continue; application for permission to appeal dismissed; appeals pending on certain orders.
- Legal Topics
- Spousal Maintenance, Lump Sum Orders, Periodical Payments, Enforcement, Appeals
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shelley Mann
Applicant
David Mann
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family / Enforcement Proceedings Post Divorce, Multiple Hearings and Appeals
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent has the means to pay the outstanding lump sum and periodical payments
- 2 Jurisdiction to make interim periodical payments order
- 3 Characterisation of payments as periodical or lump sum
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent has the means to pay the outstanding sums and is in wilful default; the court has jurisdiction to make and re-characterise orders for payment; enforcement measures including imprisonment and sequestration are justified.
Court Disposition
Orders for payment upheld; enforcement proceedings to continue; application for permission to appeal dismissed; appeals pending on certain orders.
Orders
- Interim periodical payments order of £10,000 per month from 1st November, with arrears of £42,000 payable within seven days.
- Payments under emergency order to be credited against lump sum liability.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment