Thomas, R. v (Rev 1)
The grounds of appeal were entirely without merit; the trial judge's directions were proper and in accordance with the law, and the application for extension of time was inexcusably late without reasonable excuse.
- Parties
- Respondent: Regina; Applicant: Shem Frank Thomas
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 March 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Permission to Appeal Conviction
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Attempted Murder, Possession of Firearm With Intent to Endanger Life, Appeal Against Conviction, Joint Enterprise, Circumstantial Evidence, Adverse Inference From Silence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Respondent
Shem Frank Thomas
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Permission to Appeal Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge's directions on circumstantial evidence and refusal to give evidence rendered the conviction unsafe
- 2 Whether the judge erred in law regarding joint enterprise and participation under R v Jogee
- 3 Whether the delay in filing the appeal was excusable
Ratio Decidendi
The grounds of appeal were entirely without merit; the trial judge's directions were proper and in accordance with the law, and the application for extension of time was inexcusably late without reasonable excuse.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- Application for extension of time to appeal is refused.
- Had the extension been granted, permission to appeal would have been refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment