R v Sheraz Hussain

R v Sheraz Hussain

The fresh audio evidence from the CCTV footage was inconclusive, did not establish the applicant's presence in the Mercedes, and did not affect the safety of the conviction. The circumstantial case against the applicant was strong, and the alibi defence was weak and improbable. Therefore, the application to adduce fresh evidence and for an extension of time was refused.

Parties
Respondent: Rex; Applicant: Sheraz Hussain
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
16 October 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Adduce Fresh Evidence
Outcome
application refused
Legal Topics
Murder, Fresh Evidence, Appeal Procedure, Gang Violence, Alibi
Criminal Law Murder Fresh Evidence Appeal Procedure Gang Violence Alibi

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Respondent

Sheraz Hussain

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Adduce Fresh Evidence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether fresh audio evidence from CCTV footage should be admitted on appeal
  2. 2 Whether the conviction is unsafe in light of the new evidence
  3. 3 Whether there is a reasonable explanation for failure to adduce the evidence at trial

Ratio Decidendi

The fresh audio evidence from the CCTV footage was inconclusive, did not establish the applicant's presence in the Mercedes, and did not affect the safety of the conviction. The circumstantial case against the applicant was strong, and the alibi defence was weak and improbable. Therefore, the application to adduce fresh evidence and for an extension of time was refused.

Court Disposition

application refused

Orders

  • application to adduce fresh evidence refused
  • application for extension of time refused