Vajpeyi v Yusaf

Vajpeyi v Yusaf

The presumption of a resulting trust in favour of the Claimant was weak and rebutted by the evidence, including the nature of the parties' relationship, the absence of any claim or demand for over 20 years, and the conduct of the parties. The £10,000 was a loan, not a capital contribution. The loans of £10,000 and £100,000 were repaid, save for £4,070.11 outstanding. No interest was payable on the £100,000 loan as the agreement expressly excluded it.

Parties
Claimant: Ravi Vajpeyi; Defendant: Shuaib Yusaf
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
19 September 2003
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Claim dismissed save for admitted outstanding sum; counterclaim succeeds in principle
Legal Topics
Resulting Trusts, Rebuttal of Presumption, Loan Repayment, Beneficial Ownership, Estoppel by Convention, Interest on Loans
Equity Trusts Property Law Resulting Trusts Rebuttal of Presumption Loan Repayment Beneficial Ownership Estoppel by Convention +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ravi Vajpeyi

Claimant

Shuaib Yusaf

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the £10,000 advanced by the Claimant towards the purchase of 108 Brigstock Road was a loan or a capital contribution giving rise to a resulting trust
  2. 2 Whether the presumption of a resulting trust was rebutted
  3. 3 Whether the loans of £10,000 and £100,000 were repaid

Ratio Decidendi

The presumption of a resulting trust in favour of the Claimant was weak and rebutted by the evidence, including the nature of the parties' relationship, the absence of any claim or demand for over 20 years, and the conduct of the parties. The £10,000 was a loan, not a capital contribution. The loans of £10,000 and £100,000 were repaid, save for £4,070.11 outstanding. No interest was payable on the £100,000 loan as the agreement expressly excluded it.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed save for admitted outstanding sum; counterclaim succeeds in principle

Orders

  • Claimant's claim dismissed except for £4,070.11 due to her
  • Defendant entitled to redeem the mortgage on payment of £4,070.11