BM Brazil I Fundo De Investimento Em Participações Multistrategia & Ors v Sibanye BM Brazil (Pty) Ltd & Anor
The geotechnical event (GE) at the Santa Rita Mine did not constitute a Material Adverse Effect (MAE) under the SPA. The GE was not material in its quantitative or qualitative aspects, either as at the date of termination or as would reasonably have been expected. The Defendants' termination of the SPA was not justified on the basis of the GE or any other ground. The Claimants' case on wilful misconduct was not made out.
- Parties
- Claimant: BM Brazil I Fundo de Investimento em Participações Multistrategia; Claimant: BM Brazil 2 Fundo de Investimento em Participações Multistrategia; Claimant: ANRH Cooperatief U. A.; Defendant: Sibanye BM Brazil (Pty) Ltd; Defendant: Sibanye Stillwater Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Contract (share Purchase Agreement) Dispute / Trial Judgment on Liability
- Outcome
- Judgment for the Claimants on liability; Defendants' termination of the SPA was wrongful; no finding of wilful misconduct.
- Legal Topics
- Material Adverse Effect (mae) Clauses, Share Purchase Agreements (spa), Contractual Interpretation, Termination of Contract, Remedies for Breach of Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BM Brazil I Fundo de Investimento em Participações Multistrategia
Claimant
BM Brazil 2 Fundo de Investimento em Participações Multistrategia
Claimant
ANRH Cooperatief U. A.
Claimant
Sibanye BM Brazil (Pty) Ltd
Defendant
Sibanye Stillwater Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Contract (share Purchase Agreement) Dispute / Trial Judgment on Liability
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the geotechnical event (GE) at the Santa Rita Mine constituted a Material Adverse Effect (MAE) under the SPA
- 2 Whether the Defendants were entitled to terminate the SPA on the basis of the GE or other grounds
- 3 Whether the Claimants were entitled to damages for wrongful repudiation
Ratio Decidendi
The geotechnical event (GE) at the Santa Rita Mine did not constitute a Material Adverse Effect (MAE) under the SPA. The GE was not material in its quantitative or qualitative aspects, either as at the date of termination or as would reasonably have been expected. The Defendants' termination of the SPA was not justified on the basis of the GE or any other ground. The Claimants' case on wilful misconduct was not made out.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the Claimants on liability; Defendants' termination of the SPA was wrongful; no finding of wilful misconduct.
Orders
- Declaration that the Defendants were not entitled to terminate the SPA on the basis of the GE or other grounds advanced.
- Claimants entitled to damages for wrongful repudiation, quantum to be determined in a separate trial.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment