Adeojo, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 1552 (27 June 2008)
The sentences imposed were not manifestly excessive and were within the appropriate range given the aggravating features; the disparity with Benson's sentence was justified by his age, lack of previous convictions, and lesser involvement.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2008] EWCA Crim 1552
- Parties
- Respondent: Regina; Appellant: Simon Adeojo; Appellant: Ronald Mugambwa
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 June 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Robbery, Sentencing, Sentencing Guidelines, Disparity in Sentencing, Youth Offenders
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Respondent
Simon Adeojo
Appellant
Ronald Mugambwa
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentences imposed on the appellants were manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether the sentencing judge failed to have regard to the definitive sentencing guidelines
- 3 Whether the disparity between the sentences of the appellants and their co-accused Benson was unjustified
Ratio Decidendi
The sentences imposed were not manifestly excessive and were within the appropriate range given the aggravating features; the disparity with Benson's sentence was justified by his age, lack of previous convictions, and lesser involvement.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment