R v Simon Coombes (aka Simon Tharme)
There is no merit in any grounds for appeal against conviction or sentence, no justification for extension of time or admission of fresh evidence, and the sentence imposed was appropriate given the facts and aggravating factors.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: Simon Coombes (aka Simon Tharme); Co Defendant: Luke Sullivan
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- Renewed applications for extension of time, leave to appeal, and admission of fresh evidence refused; loss of time order imposed
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Offences, Rape, Appeals, Sentencing, Loss of Time Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Simon Coombes (aka Simon Tharme)
Applicant
Luke Sullivan
Co Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there are grounds to extend time for appeal against conviction and sentence
- 2 Whether fresh evidence should be admitted
- 3 Whether conviction is safe
Ratio Decidendi
There is no merit in any grounds for appeal against conviction or sentence, no justification for extension of time or admission of fresh evidence, and the sentence imposed was appropriate given the facts and aggravating factors.
Court Disposition
Renewed applications for extension of time, leave to appeal, and admission of fresh evidence refused; loss of time order imposed
Orders
- 56 days shall not count towards applicant's sentence
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment