Edwards, R. v

Edwards, R. v

The trial judge's restrictions on cross-examination of the child witness did not render the trial unfair or the conviction unsafe. The judge was entitled to manage the questioning to avoid confusion for a very young witness, and the defence case was adequately put before the jury through other means. There was no...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Prosecutor: Regina; Appellant: Simon David Edwards
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
16 November 2011
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Child Witness, Cross Examination, Competency of Witness, Fair Trial, Case Management
Criminal Law Evidence Child Witness Cross Examination Competency of Witness Fair Trial Case Management

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecutor

Simon David Edwards

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge's restrictions on cross-examination of a child witness amounted to a material irregularity and rendered the trial unfair
  2. 2 Whether the child witness was competent to give evidence given her age and the delay between the alleged offence and trial

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge's restrictions on cross-examination of the child witness did not render the trial unfair or the conviction unsafe. The judge was entitled to manage the questioning to avoid confusion for a very young witness, and the defence case was adequately put before the jury through other means. There was no failure to consider the witness's competency, and the summing-up was fair and balanced. The appeal on ground 1 is dismissed, and leave to appeal on ground 2 is refused.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal on ground 1 rejected
  • Leave to appeal on ground 2 refused