Tadros & Anor v Barratt & Ors
The Foundation is a separate legal entity and the Netherlands is the natural forum for disputes regarding the Dutch will. The Foundation's conduct in pursuing Dutch proceedings is not vexatious or oppressive. There are limited juridical advantages to the Foundation in the Netherlands, but comity and forum considerations weigh against granting an anti-suit injunction. The Second Defendant, in her personal capacity, does not oppose the injunction, but as executrix, her continuation of Dutch proceedings is not sufficient to justify an injunction given the Foundation's independent right to litigate. There is no need for an English freezing order as Dutch courts are the proper forum for asset...
- Parties
- Claimant: Nabil Tadros; Claimant: Izzat Tadros; Defendant: Simon Dennis Barratt; Defendant: Tzesi Karra; Defendant: Fouad Abdo Tadros; Defendant: Gracy Lewis Tadros; Defendant: Wedad Lewis Tadros; Defendant: Georgette Lewis Tadros; Defendant: Robert Lewis Tadros; Defendant: Samir Joseph Tadros; Defendant: Stichting Dr Basile Khoudokormoff Charitable Foundation for Orphans
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 August 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Probate/inheritance / Interlocutory Application for Anti Suit Injunction and Freezing Order
- Outcome
- Application for anti-suit injunction and freezing order dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Anti Suit Injunctions, Forum Non Conveniens, Validity of Wills, Domicile, Estate Administration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nabil Tadros
Claimant
Izzat Tadros
Claimant
Simon Dennis Barratt
Defendant
Tzesi Karra
Defendant
Fouad Abdo Tadros
Defendant
Gracy Lewis Tadros
Defendant
Wedad Lewis Tadros
Defendant
Georgette Lewis Tadros
Defendant
Robert Lewis Tadros
Defendant
Samir Joseph Tadros
Defendant
Stichting Dr Basile Khoudokormoff Charitable Foundation for Orphans
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Probate/inheritance / Interlocutory Application for Anti Suit Injunction and Freezing Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an anti-suit injunction should restrain Dutch proceedings regarding the deceased's estate
- 2 Whether a freezing order should be granted over Dutch assets
- 3 Determination of the natural forum for disputes regarding the English and Dutch wills
Ratio Decidendi
The Foundation is a separate legal entity and the Netherlands is the natural forum for disputes regarding the Dutch will. The Foundation's conduct in pursuing Dutch proceedings is not vexatious or oppressive. There are limited juridical advantages to the Foundation in the Netherlands, but comity and forum considerations weigh against granting an anti-suit injunction. The Second Defendant, in her personal capacity, does not oppose the injunction, but as executrix, her continuation of Dutch proceedings is not sufficient to justify an injunction given the Foundation's independent right to litigate. There is no need for an English freezing order as Dutch courts are the proper forum for asset...
Court Disposition
Application for anti-suit injunction and freezing order dismissed.
Orders
- No anti-suit injunction granted against Second Defendant or Foundation.
- No freezing order granted over Dutch assets.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment