Tadros & Anor v Barratt & Ors

Tadros & Anor v Barratt & Ors

The Foundation is a separate legal entity and the Netherlands is the natural forum for disputes regarding the Dutch will. The Foundation's conduct in pursuing Dutch proceedings is not vexatious or oppressive. There are limited juridical advantages to the Foundation in the Netherlands, but comity and forum considerations weigh against granting an anti-suit injunction. The Second Defendant, in her personal capacity, does not oppose the injunction, but as executrix, her continuation of Dutch proceedings is not sufficient to justify an injunction given the Foundation's independent right to litigate. There is no need for an English freezing order as Dutch courts are the proper forum for asset...

Parties
Claimant: Nabil Tadros; Claimant: Izzat Tadros; Defendant: Simon Dennis Barratt; Defendant: Tzesi Karra; Defendant: Fouad Abdo Tadros; Defendant: Gracy Lewis Tadros; Defendant: Wedad Lewis Tadros; Defendant: Georgette Lewis Tadros; Defendant: Robert Lewis Tadros; Defendant: Samir Joseph Tadros; Defendant: Stichting Dr Basile Khoudokormoff Charitable Foundation for Orphans
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
21 August 2014
Procedural Posture
Probate/inheritance / Interlocutory Application for Anti Suit Injunction and Freezing Order
Outcome
Application for anti-suit injunction and freezing order dismissed.
Legal Topics
Anti Suit Injunctions, Forum Non Conveniens, Validity of Wills, Domicile, Estate Administration

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nabil Tadros

Claimant

Izzat Tadros

Claimant

Simon Dennis Barratt

Defendant

Tzesi Karra

Defendant

Fouad Abdo Tadros

Defendant

Gracy Lewis Tadros

Defendant

Wedad Lewis Tadros

Defendant

Georgette Lewis Tadros

Defendant

Robert Lewis Tadros

Defendant

Samir Joseph Tadros

Defendant

Stichting Dr Basile Khoudokormoff Charitable Foundation for Orphans

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Probate/inheritance / Interlocutory Application for Anti Suit Injunction and Freezing Order

  1. 1 Whether an anti-suit injunction should restrain Dutch proceedings regarding the deceased's estate
  2. 2 Whether a freezing order should be granted over Dutch assets
  3. 3 Determination of the natural forum for disputes regarding the English and Dutch wills

Ratio Decidendi

The Foundation is a separate legal entity and the Netherlands is the natural forum for disputes regarding the Dutch will. The Foundation's conduct in pursuing Dutch proceedings is not vexatious or oppressive. There are limited juridical advantages to the Foundation in the Netherlands, but comity and forum considerations weigh against granting an anti-suit injunction. The Second Defendant, in her personal capacity, does not oppose the injunction, but as executrix, her continuation of Dutch proceedings is not sufficient to justify an injunction given the Foundation's independent right to litigate. There is no need for an English freezing order as Dutch courts are the proper forum for asset...

Court Disposition

Application for anti-suit injunction and freezing order dismissed.

Orders

  • No anti-suit injunction granted against Second Defendant or Foundation.
  • No freezing order granted over Dutch assets.