Simon Harold Robert v Office of Fair Trading

Simon Harold Robert v Office of Fair Trading

The appeal is disposed of by confirming the Respondent's determination, with variation to permit the Appellant to collect debts under regulated agreements entered into before December 2011, subject to compliance with specified statutory and regulatory requirements.

Parties
Appellant: Simon Harold Roberts; Respondent: Office of Fair Trading
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
20 August 2012
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Consent Order
Outcome
Appeal disposed of by consent order; Respondent's determination confirmed with variation; no order as to costs.
Legal Topics
Debt Collection, Licensing Determination, Regulated Agreements

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Simon Harold Roberts

Appellant

Office of Fair Trading

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Consent Order

  1. 1 Whether the Respondent's determination should be confirmed or varied to allow the Appellant to collect debts under regulated agreements entered into before December 2011.

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal is disposed of by confirming the Respondent's determination, with variation to permit the Appellant to collect debts under regulated agreements entered into before December 2011, subject to compliance with specified statutory and regulatory requirements.

Court Disposition

Appeal disposed of by consent order; Respondent's determination confirmed with variation; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • Respondent's determination dated 16 January 2012 confirmed except as varied.
  • Appellant permitted to carry out debt-collecting under regulated agreements entered into before December 2011 from the date of this order until 30 November 2012, subject to compliance with specified requirements.