Gloucester Place Music Ltd v Le Bon & Ors [2016] EWHC 3091 (Ch) (02 December 2016)
The agreements, properly construed under English law, required the defendants to vest the entire US copyrights in the claimant for the full term, implicitly precluding exercise of US statutory termination rights under section 203; serving the termination notices was a breach of contract.
- Citation
- [2016] EWHC 3091 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Gloucester Place Music Limited; Defendant: Simon Le Bon; Defendant: Nigel Taylor; Defendant: Nicholas Bates; Defendant: Roger Taylor; Defendant: Andrew Taylor; Defendant: Noticevale Limited; Defendant: Hintcrest Limited; Defendant: Youngstown Limited; Defendant: Exitglen Limited; Defendant: Humbleward Limited; Defendant: Vetchcrest Limited; Defendant: Actionlink Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 December 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Part 8 Claim (interpretation of Contract) / First Instance Judgment
- Outcome
- Declarations to be granted in favour of the claimant; defendants have acted in breach of contract by serving or not withdrawing the termination notices.
- Legal Topics
- Copyright Assignment, Interpretation of Contracts, International Copyright, Non Derogation From Grant, Jurisdiction and Applicable Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gloucester Place Music Limited
Claimant
Simon Le Bon
Defendant
Nigel Taylor
Defendant
Nicholas Bates
Defendant
Roger Taylor
Defendant
Andrew Taylor
Defendant
Noticevale Limited
Defendant
Hintcrest Limited
Defendant
Youngstown Limited
Defendant
Exitglen Limited
Defendant
Humbleward Limited
Defendant
Vetchcrest Limited
Defendant
Actionlink Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Part 8 Claim (interpretation of Contract) / First Instance Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants breached music publishing agreements by serving US copyright termination notices under section 203 of the US Copyright Act 1976
- 2 Whether the agreements precluded exercise of US statutory termination rights
Ratio Decidendi
The agreements, properly construed under English law, required the defendants to vest the entire US copyrights in the claimant for the full term, implicitly precluding exercise of US statutory termination rights under section 203; serving the termination notices was a breach of contract.
Court Disposition
Declarations to be granted in favour of the claimant; defendants have acted in breach of contract by serving or not withdrawing the termination notices.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment