O'Brien v Phipps [2023] EWHC 1153 (Ch) (15 May 2023)

O'Brien v Phipps [2023] EWHC 1153 (Ch) (15 May 2023)

The court found that there was no express oral trust declared by the defendant over his shares in Shortfall Cover LLC for the claimant's benefit, nor was there a binding Profit and Loss Sharing Agreement as alleged by the defendant. The claimant failed to discharge the burden of proof for the trust, and the evidence did not support the existence of the alleged oral agreement or fiduciary obligations in respect of Shortfall. The claim and counterclaim were both dismissed.

Citation
[2023] EWHC 1153 (Ch)
Parties
Claimant: Mark Julian O'Brien; Defendant: Simon Phipps
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
15 May 2023
Procedural Posture
Chancery Division Business Dispute / High Court Trial Judgment
Outcome
Claim and counterclaim dismissed
Legal Topics
Express Trusts, Declaration of Trust, Shareholding Disputes, Oral Agreements, Fiduciary Duties, Profit and Loss Sharing Agreements
Equity and Trusts Company Law Contract Law Express Trusts Declaration of Trust Shareholding Disputes Oral Agreements Fiduciary Duties +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mark Julian O'Brien

Claimant

Simon Phipps

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Chancery Division Business Dispute / High Court Trial Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether an express oral trust was declared by the defendant over shares in Shortfall Cover LLC for the claimant's benefit
  2. 2 Whether there existed a binding Profit and Loss Sharing Agreement between the parties
  3. 3 Whether the claimant was entitled to half the net proceeds of sale of the defendant's shares in Shortfall Cover LLC

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that there was no express oral trust declared by the defendant over his shares in Shortfall Cover LLC for the claimant's benefit, nor was there a binding Profit and Loss Sharing Agreement as alleged by the defendant. The claimant failed to discharge the burden of proof for the trust, and the evidence did not support the existence of the alleged oral agreement or fiduciary obligations in respect of Shortfall. The claim and counterclaim were both dismissed.

Court Disposition

Claim and counterclaim dismissed

Orders

  • Claimant's claim for a declaration of trust and share of proceeds dismissed
  • Defendant's counterclaim for breach of Profit and Loss Sharing Agreement dismissed