Thomas & Anor (Joint Liquidators of GBI Investments Ltd) v Jakes & Anor

Thomas & Anor (Joint Liquidators of GBI Investments Ltd) v Jakes & Anor

Respondents committed contempt by disposing of shares contrary to the First Order and by deliberately deceiving the court about their possession of shares; personal service requirements for prohibitory orders were satisfied as respondents had notice.

Parties
Applicant: Simon Robert Thomas; Applicant: Robert Harry Pick; Respondent: Boris Jakes; Respondent: Juraj Nestarec
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
09 March 2012
Procedural Posture
Committal Application / Judgment on Liability for Contempt
Outcome
Contempt proved against both respondents on two counts; penalty to be determined.
Legal Topics
Liquidation, Personal Service, Cross Border Insolvency, Committal for Contempt

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Simon Robert Thomas

Applicant

Robert Harry Pick

Applicant

Boris Jakes

Respondent

Juraj Nestarec

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Committal Application / Judgment on Liability for Contempt

  1. 1 Whether respondents breached court orders by disposing of shares and deceiving the court
  2. 2 Whether personal service requirements were satisfied for committal
  3. 3 Whether respondents' conduct constituted contempt of court

Ratio Decidendi

Respondents committed contempt by disposing of shares contrary to the First Order and by deliberately deceiving the court about their possession of shares; personal service requirements for prohibitory orders were satisfied as respondents had notice.

Court Disposition

Contempt proved against both respondents on two counts; penalty to be determined.

Orders

  • Court will hear submissions as to penalty for contempt.