British Chiropractic Association v Singh

British Chiropractic Association v Singh

The article conveys that the claimant knowingly promotes bogus treatments for children, despite knowing there is no evidence to support such claims; this is a factual assertion, not mere opinion, and is defamatory of the claimant.

Parties
Claimant: British Chiropractic Association; Defendant: Simon Singh
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
07 May 2009
Procedural Posture
Libel Action / Preliminary Ruling on Meaning and Fact/comment Distinction
Outcome
Claimant's pleaded meanings upheld; defendant's remarks classified as factual assertions.
Legal Topics
Corporate Defamation, Meaning of Words, Fact Vs Comment, Fair Comment Defence, Justification Defence
Defamation Media Law Corporate Defamation Meaning of Words Fact Vs Comment Fair Comment Defence Justification Defence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

British Chiropractic Association

Claimant

Simon Singh

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Libel Action / Preliminary Ruling on Meaning and Fact/comment Distinction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the words complained of are defamatory of the claimant
  2. 2 Whether the words complained of constitute allegations of fact or comment

Ratio Decidendi

The article conveys that the claimant knowingly promotes bogus treatments for children, despite knowing there is no evidence to support such claims; this is a factual assertion, not mere opinion, and is defamatory of the claimant.

Court Disposition

Claimant's pleaded meanings upheld; defendant's remarks classified as factual assertions.

Orders

  • Ruling that the words complained of bear the defamatory meanings pleaded by the claimant.
  • Ruling that the words complained of constitute allegations of fact, not comment.