Johnson v Sinclair

Johnson v Sinclair

The defendant failed to act promptly in applying to set aside the judgment, did not provide a good reason for non-attendance at trial, and did not demonstrate a reasonable prospect of success on the merits. The cumulative requirements of CPR 39.3(5) were not met, and the lower courts' exercise of discretion was not plainly wrong.

Parties
Claimant: Johnson; Defendant: Sinclair
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
23 May 2008
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court to Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Setting Aside Judgment, Default Judgment, Non Attendance at Trial, Illegality Defence
Civil Procedure Setting Aside Judgment Default Judgment Non Attendance at Trial Illegality Defence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Johnson

Claimant

Sinclair

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court to Court of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the requirements under CPR 39.3(5) for setting aside a judgment for non-attendance were met
  2. 2 Whether the defendant acted promptly in applying to set aside the judgment
  3. 3 Whether the defendant had a good reason for non-attendance at trial

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant failed to act promptly in applying to set aside the judgment, did not provide a good reason for non-attendance at trial, and did not demonstrate a reasonable prospect of success on the merits. The cumulative requirements of CPR 39.3(5) were not met, and the lower courts' exercise of discretion was not plainly wrong.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • No order setting aside the judgment of 29 June