Marwaha & Ors v Singh & Ors [2013] EWHC B6 (Ch) (18 February 2013)

Marwaha & Ors v Singh & Ors [2013] EWHC B6 (Ch) (18 February 2013)

The purported amendment to the charity constitution was not validly passed as procedural requirements for amendment ballots were not complied with; neither assent nor estoppel by convention applies to bind future members. The court will compel trustees to perform mandatory duties but will not interfere with the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] EWHC B6 (Ch)
Parties
Claimant: PS Marwaha & Others; Defendant: Singh & Others; Defendant: Attorney General
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
18 February 2013
Procedural Posture
Trial / Final Judgment
Outcome
Declaration granted as to future effect of purported amendment; challenge to conduct of 2012 renewal process dismissed.
Legal Topics
Amendment of Charity Constitution, Membership Eligibility, Estoppel by Convention, Discretion of Trustees, Proper Administration of Charities
Charity Law Trusts and Trustees Unincorporated Associations Amendment of Charity Constitution Membership Eligibility Estoppel by Convention Discretion of Trustees Proper Administration of Charities

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

PS Marwaha & Others

Claimant

Singh & Others

Defendant

Attorney General

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Trial / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a purported amendment to the charity constitution is valid and binding
  2. 2 Whether claimants are estopped by convention from denying the amendment
  3. 3 Whether the 2012 membership renewal process was properly conducted

Ratio Decidendi

The purported amendment to the charity constitution was not validly passed as procedural requirements for amendment ballots were not complied with; neither assent nor estoppel by convention applies to bind future members. The court will compel trustees to perform mandatory duties but will not interfere with the exercise of discretion absent impropriety. The 2012 renewal process, though not optimal, did not involve impropriety and thus does not warrant court intervention.

Court Disposition

Declaration granted as to future effect of purported amendment; challenge to conduct of 2012 renewal process dismissed.

Orders

  • Declaration that the purported amendment to the constitution is not binding for the future.
  • Amendment to the scheme required for completion of 2012 registration process and holding of election.