British Chiropractic Association v Singh [2009] EWCA Civ 1154 (14 October 2009)
Permission to appeal is granted because it is arguable that the judge's findings risk striking the balance between the right of reputation and the right of free expression too far in favour of reputation and against free expression, and that the judge may have conflated the issues of meaning and classification as fact or comment.
- Citation
- [2009] EWCA Civ 1154
- Parties
- Respondent: British Chiropractic Association; Appellant: Singh
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 October 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Libel Action (defamation) / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal Against Preliminary Rulings
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal granted
- Legal Topics
- Libel, Fair Comment Defence, Freedom of Expression, Article 10 ECHR
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
British Chiropractic Association
Respondent
Singh
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Libel Action (defamation) / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal Against Preliminary Rulings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the words complained of are statements of fact or comment
- 2 Whether the fair comment defence is available to the appellant
- 3 Whether the judge's approach imposed a disproportionate burden on the appellant
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to appeal is granted because it is arguable that the judge's findings risk striking the balance between the right of reputation and the right of free expression too far in favour of reputation and against free expression, and that the judge may have conflated the issues of meaning and classification as fact or comment.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal granted
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal is granted
- A substitute skeleton argument not exceeding 20 pages should be prepared for the appeal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment