McKillen v Misland (Cyprus) Investments Ltd & Ors
Permission to amend the pleadings is granted only to the extent that the amendments raise arguable cases, particularly as to shadow directorship (but not de facto directorship or fiduciary duties between shareholders), and provided the pleadings are restructured for clarity. Amendments that are unarguable,...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Petitioner/claimant: Patrick McKillen; Respondent/defendant: Misland (Cyprus) Investments Limited; Respondent/defendant: Derek Quinlan; Respondent/defendant: Ellerman Corporation Limited; Respondent/defendant: B Overseas Limited; Respondent/defendant: Richard Faber; Respondent/defendant: Michael Seal; Respondent/defendant: Rigel Mowatt; Respondent/defendant: Coroin Limited; Defendant: Sir David Rowat Barclay; Defendant: Sir Frederick Hugh Barclay; Defendant: Maybourne Finance Limited; Defendant: The Trustees of the Sir David and Sir Frederick Barclay Family Settlements; Defendant: National Asset Loan Management Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 March 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Petition Under Section 994 of the Companies Act 2006 and Associated Part 7 Claim / Interlocutory Application for Permission to Amend Pleadings and for Further Information
- Outcome
- Partial grant of permission to amend; partial refusal; order for further information.
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Prejudice, Directors' Duties, Shareholders' Agreements, Fiduciary Duties, Good Faith, Amendment of Pleadings, Shadow and De Facto Directors, Disclosure, Conspiracy, Remedies Under Companies Act
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Patrick McKillen
Petitioner/claimant
Misland (Cyprus) Investments Limited
Respondent/defendant
Derek Quinlan
Respondent/defendant
Ellerman Corporation Limited
Respondent/defendant
B Overseas Limited
Respondent/defendant
Richard Faber
Respondent/defendant
Michael Seal
Respondent/defendant
Rigel Mowatt
Respondent/defendant
Coroin Limited
Respondent/defendant
Sir David Rowat Barclay
Defendant
Sir Frederick Hugh Barclay
Defendant
Maybourne Finance Limited
Defendant
The Trustees of the Sir David and Sir Frederick Barclay Family Settlements
Defendant
National Asset Loan Management Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Petition Under Section 994 of the Companies Act 2006 and Associated Part 7 Claim / Interlocutory Application for Permission to Amend Pleadings and for Further Information
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether permission should be granted to amend the Petition and Particulars of Claim to include new allegations and claims, including shadow/de facto directorship, breach of good faith, and fiduciary duties between shareholders; Whether the amendments are arguable in law and not unduly late; Whether further information should be provided by the claimant regarding events of default under the Shareholders Agreement.
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to amend the pleadings is granted only to the extent that the amendments raise arguable cases, particularly as to shadow directorship (but not de facto directorship or fiduciary duties between shareholders), and provided the pleadings are restructured for clarity. Amendments that are unarguable, confusing, or unsupported by law are refused. The claimant must also provide further information regarding events of default, consistent with his own demands of the respondents.
Court Disposition
Partial grant of permission to amend; partial refusal; order for further information.
Orders
- Permission granted to amend the Petition and Particulars of Claim only to the extent specified in the judgment, with required restructuring for clarity.
- Permission refused to plead de facto directorship, fiduciary duties between shareholders, and certain other unarguable or confusing amendments.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment