Diamandis v Wills & Anor
Permission to re-amend is granted for the contract claim based on demand/afford for all services supplied, as the amendments are sufficiently pleaded and arise out of substantially the same facts; permission is refused for the 'afford only' contract claim and for restitution claims relating to services before 25 July 2008, as they are either inadequately pleaded, unsustainable in law, or do not arise out of the same facts and are arguably time-barred.
- Parties
- Claimant: Michael Agapios Diamandis; Defendant: Sir David Seton Wills; Defendant: James Seton Wills
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 February 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Ruling on Appeal and Application to Re Amend Particulars of Claim
- Outcome
- Permission to re-amend granted in part; appeal disposed subject to further submissions on costs and consequential matters.
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Pleadings, Limitation of Actions, Quantum Meruit, Illegality in Contracts, Summary Judgment, Strike Out Applications
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Agapios Diamandis
Claimant
Sir David Seton Wills
Defendant
James Seton Wills
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Ruling on Appeal and Application to Re Amend Particulars of Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether permission should be granted to re-amend the particulars of claim to introduce new contract and restitution claims
- 2 Whether the proposed amendments are time-barred under limitation statutes
- 3 Whether the claims in restitution are sustainable in law where a contract exists or is void/illegal
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to re-amend is granted for the contract claim based on demand/afford for all services supplied, as the amendments are sufficiently pleaded and arise out of substantially the same facts; permission is refused for the 'afford only' contract claim and for restitution claims relating to services before 25 July 2008, as they are either inadequately pleaded, unsustainable in law, or do not arise out of the same facts and are arguably time-barred.
Court Disposition
Permission to re-amend granted in part; appeal disposed subject to further submissions on costs and consequential matters.
Orders
- Claimant to submit revised particulars of claim reflecting the judgment for court approval.
- Permission to re-amend granted for contract claim based on demand/afford for all services supplied.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment