Pemberton, R. v [2021] EWCA Crim 1768 (12 November 2021)
The operational period of the suspended sentence was manifestly excessive and should be reduced to 12 months; there was no basis for full credit for the guilty plea as the appellant could have pleaded sooner; the custodial threshold was properly crossed given the seriousness and impact of the offence.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] EWCA Crim 1768
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Appellant: Sjayquan Pemberton
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 November 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part, dismissed in part
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Assault, Sentencing, Credit for Guilty Plea, Suspended Sentence, Custodial Threshold
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Sjayquan Pemberton
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the operational period of the suspended sentence was manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether the appellant was entitled to full credit for his guilty plea
- 3 Whether the custodial threshold was properly crossed
Ratio Decidendi
The operational period of the suspended sentence was manifestly excessive and should be reduced to 12 months; there was no basis for full credit for the guilty plea as the appellant could have pleaded sooner; the custodial threshold was properly crossed given the seriousness and impact of the offence.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part, dismissed in part
Orders
- Operational period of suspended sentence reduced from 24 months to 12 months
- All other elements of the sentence remain unaltered
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment