SJS v Disclosure and Barring Service

SJS v Disclosure and Barring Service

DBS made a material mistake of law by failing to consider a relevant positive reference regarding SJS's conduct, which was central to its concerns about inappropriate language. The matter is remitted for a new decision, but SJS remains on the barred list pending that decision.

Parties
Appellant: SJS; Respondent: Disclosure and Barring Service
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
22 July 2024
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Administrative Decision (barring) / Upper Tribunal Judgment After Oral Hearing
Outcome
Remitted to DBS for a new decision; appellant remains on barred list pending outcome
Legal Topics
Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups, Barred List Appeals, Mistake of Fact, Mistake of Law, Proportionality, Professional Misconduct

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

SJS

Appellant

Disclosure and Barring Service

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal From Administrative Decision (barring) / Upper Tribunal Judgment After Oral Hearing

  1. 1 Whether the Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) made a mistake of fact or law in including SJS in the children's barred list
  2. 2 Whether the DBS failed to consider relevant evidence, including a positive reference
  3. 3 Whether the decision to bar SJS was proportionate

Ratio Decidendi

DBS made a material mistake of law by failing to consider a relevant positive reference regarding SJS's conduct, which was central to its concerns about inappropriate language. The matter is remitted for a new decision, but SJS remains on the barred list pending that decision.

Court Disposition

Remitted to DBS for a new decision; appellant remains on barred list pending outcome

Orders

  • Matter remitted to DBS for a new decision in light of the TR project reference of 10 May 2022
  • Appellant to remain in the barred lists until DBS makes its new decision