SK, R. v

SK, R. v

The trial judge's summing-up failed to adequately direct the jury on the legal concepts of slavery, servitude, and forced or compulsory labour under Article 4 ECHR, focusing excessively on economic factors and failing to distil the essential legal questions, rendering the conviction unsafe.

Parties
Respondent: Regina; Appellant: SK
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
08 July 2011
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; retrial ordered.
Legal Topics
Trafficking, Exploitation, Slavery, Servitude, Forced Labour, Article 4 ECHR
Criminal Law Human Rights Law Trafficking Exploitation Slavery Servitude Forced Labour Article 4 ECHR

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Respondent

SK

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge properly directed the jury on the legal definition of exploitation under section 4 of the Asylum and Immigration (Treatment of Claimants) Act 2004
  2. 2 Whether the conviction was unsafe due to inadequate directions on the concepts of slavery, servitude, and forced or compulsory labour

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge's summing-up failed to adequately direct the jury on the legal concepts of slavery, servitude, and forced or compulsory labour under Article 4 ECHR, focusing excessively on economic factors and failing to distil the essential legal questions, rendering the conviction unsafe.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; retrial ordered.

Orders

  • Conviction quashed
  • Retrial ordered