SL v SM
The wife has capacity to decide on divorce and conduct proceedings; Part 7 of the Family Procedure Rules is not incompatible with the Human Rights Act; English courts have jurisdiction over the marriage; permission for nullity petition and stay for mediation/legal aid are denied.
- Parties
- Applicant: SL; Respondent: SM
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 May 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce / Interlocutory Judgment on Capacity and Procedural Compatibility
- Outcome
- Applications by the husband are rejected; matter transferred for prompt progression of divorce.
- Legal Topics
- Mental Capacity, Divorce Proceedings, Jurisdiction, Procedure Compatibility, Nullity Petition
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SL
Applicant
SM
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce / Interlocutory Judgment on Capacity and Procedural Compatibility
Legal Issues
- 1 whether the wife had capacity to decide on divorce and conduct proceedings
- 2 whether Part 7 of the Family Procedure Rules 2010 is incompatible with the Human Rights Act 1998
- 3 jurisdiction of English courts over Scottish marriage
Ratio Decidendi
The wife has capacity to decide on divorce and conduct proceedings; Part 7 of the Family Procedure Rules is not incompatible with the Human Rights Act; English courts have jurisdiction over the marriage; permission for nullity petition and stay for mediation/legal aid are denied.
Court Disposition
Applications by the husband are rejected; matter transferred for prompt progression of divorce.
Orders
- Husband's applications regarding wife's capacity and procedural incompatibility are dismissed.
- Permission to issue nullity petition is denied.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment