Euro Construction Scaffolding Ltd v SLLB Construction Ltd
The adjudicator had jurisdiction because the evidence did not establish a real prospect that an oral term was agreed; the written quotation contained all agreed terms, and any fitness for purpose term was implied, not express. Adequate reservation of jurisdiction was made by SLLB, but the adjudicator's decision stands as the contract was in writing for statutory purposes.
- Parties
- Claimant: Euro Construction Scaffolding Limited; Defendant: SLLB Construction Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Enforcement of Adjudicator's Decision / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for claimant; adjudicator's decision enforced.
- Legal Topics
- Adjudication, Jurisdiction, Written Contracts, Implied Terms, Fitness for Purpose
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Euro Construction Scaffolding Limited
Claimant
SLLB Construction Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Enforcement of Adjudicator's Decision / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the adjudicator had jurisdiction to decide his own jurisdiction
- 2 Whether the contract was in writing for purposes of Section 107 of the Housing Grants Construction and Regeneration Act 1996
Ratio Decidendi
The adjudicator had jurisdiction because the evidence did not establish a real prospect that an oral term was agreed; the written quotation contained all agreed terms, and any fitness for purpose term was implied, not express. Adequate reservation of jurisdiction was made by SLLB, but the adjudicator's decision stands as the contract was in writing for statutory purposes.
Court Disposition
Judgment for claimant; adjudicator's decision enforced.
Orders
- Judgment for Euro Construction Scaffolding Limited for £22,496.60
- Interest of £2,209.60 (and continuing)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment