SM v PM
The mother proved on the balance of probabilities that the father subjected her to coercive control, physical, emotional, and sexual abuse throughout the marriage, and to a lesser extent abused the children. The father's allegations against the mother were not proved. The mother abducted the children from the jurisdiction, but her actions were precipitated by credible threats and abuse from the father.
- Parties
- Applicant: SM; Respondent: PM
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Family / Fact Finding Judgment
- Outcome
- Mother's allegations of abuse proved; father's allegations not proved; finding of admitted child abduction by mother.
- Legal Topics
- Domestic Abuse, Child Abduction, Coercive Control, Physical Abuse, Sexual Abuse, Financial Control, Child Arrangements, Jurisdiction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SM
Applicant
PM
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family / Fact Finding Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the mother was subjected to domestic abuse by the father
- 2 Whether the father was subjected to abuse by the mother
- 3 Whether the mother abducted the children from the jurisdiction
Ratio Decidendi
The mother proved on the balance of probabilities that the father subjected her to coercive control, physical, emotional, and sexual abuse throughout the marriage, and to a lesser extent abused the children. The father's allegations against the mother were not proved. The mother abducted the children from the jurisdiction, but her actions were precipitated by credible threats and abuse from the father.
Court Disposition
Mother's allegations of abuse proved; father's allegations not proved; finding of admitted child abduction by mother.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment