Smithson & Ors v Hamilton [2008] EWCA Civ 996 (23 July 2008)
The court approved the compromise under CPR 19.7, being satisfied that it was for the benefit of all represented parties, and ordered that the relevant words in the pension scheme be treated as being avoided, with the compromise to be binding 28 days after notification to members, allowing liberty to apply in the meantime.
- Citation
- [2008] EWCA Civ 996
- Parties
- Appellant: Smithson & Ors; Respondent: Hamilton
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 July 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (civil) / Approval of Compromise Following Appeal and Cross Appeal
- Outcome
- Compromise approved; representation orders made; relevant pension scheme words treated as being avoided; costs order made.
- Legal Topics
- Rectification of Trust Documents, Mistake in Trust Deeds, Representative Proceedings, Approval of Compromise, Interpretation of Pension Scheme Rules
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Smithson & Ors
Appellant
Hamilton
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal (civil) / Approval of Compromise Following Appeal and Cross Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should approve a compromise affecting members of a pension scheme under CPR 19.7
- 2 Whether the compromise is for the benefit of all represented parties
- 3 Whether the relevant pension scheme rule should be treated as avoided due to mistake
Ratio Decidendi
The court approved the compromise under CPR 19.7, being satisfied that it was for the benefit of all represented parties, and ordered that the relevant words in the pension scheme be treated as being avoided, with the compromise to be binding 28 days after notification to members, allowing liberty to apply in the meantime.
Court Disposition
Compromise approved; representation orders made; relevant pension scheme words treated as being avoided; costs order made.
Orders
- Representation orders made under CPR 19.7.2 for respondent and sixth appellant to represent relevant classes of scheme members and dependants.
- Compromise in the terms of the agreement contained in the schedule to the draft order approved under CPR 19.7.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment