Miah, R (on the application of) v Snaresbrook Crown Court
Routine listing difficulties are not a good and sufficient cause for extending custody time limits; the recorder erred in granting the extension without finding exceptional circumstances.
- Parties
- Claimant: The Queen on the application of Miah; Defendant: Snaresbrook Crown Court; Interested Party: Crown Prosecution Service
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 October 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Substantive Hearing Following Grant of Permission
- Outcome
- Application for judicial review allowed; recorder's decision quashed; bail granted subject to conditions; costs order in favour of claimant subject to public funding assessment.
- Legal Topics
- Custody Time Limits, Extension of Custody Time Limits, Listing Difficulties, Bail
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Queen on the application of Miah
Claimant
Snaresbrook Crown Court
Defendant
Crown Prosecution Service
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Substantive Hearing Following Grant of Permission
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether routine listing difficulties constitute good and sufficient cause to extend custody time limits
- 2 Whether the recorder erred in extending custody time limits without finding exceptional circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
Routine listing difficulties are not a good and sufficient cause for extending custody time limits; the recorder erred in granting the extension without finding exceptional circumstances.
Court Disposition
Application for judicial review allowed; recorder's decision quashed; bail granted subject to conditions; costs order in favour of claimant subject to public funding assessment.
Orders
- Recorder's decision to extend custody time limit quashed
- Bail granted to claimant with conditions: residence at 55 Stevenage Road, London E6 2OU; not to contact complainant; not to enter London Boroughs of Hackney or Islington
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment