Begum, R (on the application of) v Social Security Commissioner
The undertaking given by the claimant's son-in-law, though not on an official form, was sufficiently formal and definite to constitute a maintenance undertaking under the relevant statutory provisions. The claimant was excluded from income support as a person subject to immigration control due to this undertaking.
- Parties
- Claimant: Zar Begum; Defendant: Social Security Commissioner
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 November 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment After Substantive Hearing
- Outcome
- Application for judicial review dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Maintenance Undertakings, Income Support Eligibility, Statutory Interpretation, Judicial Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Zar Begum
Claimant
Social Security Commissioner
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment After Substantive Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was excluded from income support due to a maintenance undertaking under immigration rules
- 2 Whether the undertaking given was sufficiently formal to meet statutory requirements
- 3 Whether the Appeal Tribunal erred in its findings regarding the duration and effect of the undertaking
Ratio Decidendi
The undertaking given by the claimant's son-in-law, though not on an official form, was sufficiently formal and definite to constitute a maintenance undertaking under the relevant statutory provisions. The claimant was excluded from income support as a person subject to immigration control due to this undertaking.
Court Disposition
Application for judicial review dismissed
Orders
- Claimant's application for judicial review is dismissed
- Respondent awarded costs, not to be enforced without leave of the court
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment