Adelaide Arkorful v Social Work England

Adelaide Arkorful v Social Work England

The appeal is dismissed because the findings of fact cannot be revisited at review hearings, the appellant failed to demonstrate insight or remediation, references lacked awareness of regulatory proceedings, and the extension of the suspension order was necessary and proportionate to protect the public and maintain confidence in the profession.

Parties
Claimant: Adelaide Arkorful; Defendant: Social Work England
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
13 June 2025
Procedural Posture
Statutory Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Extension of Suspension Order
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Fitness to Practise, Suspension Order, Remediation, Insight, Proportionality of Sanction, Review Hearings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 17 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Adelaide Arkorful

Claimant

Social Work England

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Statutory Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Extension of Suspension Order

  1. 1 Whether the findings of fact by the Original Panel were wrong
  2. 2 Whether the extension of the suspension order was unnecessary and disproportionate

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal is dismissed because the findings of fact cannot be revisited at review hearings, the appellant failed to demonstrate insight or remediation, references lacked awareness of regulatory proceedings, and the extension of the suspension order was necessary and proportionate to protect the public and maintain confidence in the profession.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Suspension order extended for six months
  • Costs submissions to be filed in writing within specified timelines