SOCIAL WORK ENGLAND v CLAIRE SHAW

SOCIAL WORK ENGLAND v CLAIRE SHAW

The extension of the Interim Suspension Order is necessary and proportionate for the protection of the public and in the public interest, given the seriousness of the allegations, ongoing proceedings, and absence of undue delay.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Applicant: Social Work England; Respondent: Claire Shaw
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
29 April 2022
Procedural Posture
Application / Interim Order Extension Hearing
Outcome
Application granted
Legal Topics
Interim Suspension Orders, Fitness to Practise, Extension of Interim Orders
Administrative Law Professional Regulation Interim Suspension Orders Fitness to Practise Extension of Interim Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Social Work England

Applicant

Claire Shaw

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application / Interim Order Extension Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether extension of the Interim Suspension Order is necessary for the protection of the public and in the public interest
  2. 2 Whether the prejudice to the respondent outweighs the necessity for extension

Ratio Decidendi

The extension of the Interim Suspension Order is necessary and proportionate for the protection of the public and in the public interest, given the seriousness of the allegations, ongoing proceedings, and absence of undue delay.

Court Disposition

Application granted

Orders

  • Interim Suspension Order extended for 6 months to 4 November 2022