Genius Sports Technologies Ltd & Ors v Soft Construct (Malta) Ltd & Ors [2022] EWHC 2308 (Ch) (27 July 2022)
Given the extraordinary and unjustified projected costs, the mismatch between parties' budgets, and the inadequacy of budgeting or detailed assessment alone to control costs, a costs cap of £5 million per side for future costs is necessary and proportionate. There is no compelling reason to join representative defendants to the counterclaim where neither the counterclaimant nor those defendants seek it.
- Citation
- [2022] EWHC 2308 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Genius Sports Technologies Limited (previously known as Genius Sports Limited); Claimant: Betgenius Limited; Claimant: Genius Sports Services Limited; Claimant: Genius Sports ANZ Pty Limited; Claimant: Genius Sports Media Inc; Claimant: Genius Sports EOOD; Claimant: Genius Sports Services Eesti OU; Claimant: Genius Sports Services Colombia SAS; Claimant: Genius Sports Network ApS; Claimant: Genius Sports Danmark ApS; Claimant: Data Project SRL; Claimant: Genius Sports LT; Claimant: Genius Sports Asia Pte Limited; Claimant: Genius Sports CH SARL; Claimant: Genius Sports Group Limited; Defendant: Soft Construct (Malta) Limited; Defendant: Royal Panda Limited; Defendant: Vivaro Limited; Defendant: Soft Construct CJSC; Defendant: Soft Construct Ukraine LLC; Defendant: Soft Construct Limited; Defendant: Basketligaen; Defendant: IMG Data Limited; Defendant: Football Dataco Limited; Defendant: Liga Super Basketball; Defendant: Bosnia and Herzegovina Football Federation; Defendant: Federatia Româna de Volei
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 July 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Case Management Conference in Multi Party Intellectual Property and Competition Litigation / Costs Management and Joinder Applications Pre Trial
- Outcome
- Costs capping order imposed; no joinder of representative defendants to counterclaim; directions for future conduct of proceedings.
- Legal Topics
- Costs Management, Costs Capping Orders, Joinder of Parties, Case Management, Disclosure, Litigation Budgeting
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Genius Sports Technologies Limited (previously known as Genius Sports Limited)
Claimant
Betgenius Limited
Claimant
Genius Sports Services Limited
Claimant
Genius Sports ANZ Pty Limited
Claimant
Genius Sports Media Inc
Claimant
Genius Sports EOOD
Claimant
Genius Sports Services Eesti OU
Claimant
Genius Sports Services Colombia SAS
Claimant
Genius Sports Network ApS
Claimant
Genius Sports Danmark ApS
Claimant
Data Project SRL
Claimant
Genius Sports LT
Claimant
Genius Sports Asia Pte Limited
Claimant
Genius Sports CH SARL
Claimant
Genius Sports Group Limited
Claimant
Soft Construct (Malta) Limited
Defendant
Royal Panda Limited
Defendant
Vivaro Limited
Defendant
Soft Construct CJSC
Defendant
Soft Construct Ukraine LLC
Defendant
Soft Construct Limited
Defendant
Basketligaen
Defendant
IMG Data Limited
Defendant
Football Dataco Limited
Defendant
Liga Super Basketball
Defendant
Bosnia and Herzegovina Football Federation
Defendant
Federatia Româna de Volei
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Case Management Conference in Multi Party Intellectual Property and Competition Litigation / Costs Management and Joinder Applications Pre Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to impose a costs capping order or costs budgeting regime in complex, high-value litigation
- 2 Whether to join certain representative defendants to the counterclaim
Ratio Decidendi
Given the extraordinary and unjustified projected costs, the mismatch between parties' budgets, and the inadequacy of budgeting or detailed assessment alone to control costs, a costs cap of £5 million per side for future costs is necessary and proportionate. There is no compelling reason to join representative defendants to the counterclaim where neither the counterclaimant nor those defendants seek it.
Court Disposition
Costs capping order imposed; no joinder of representative defendants to counterclaim; directions for future conduct of proceedings.
Orders
- Each party's future costs from 28 July 2022 are capped at £5 million, excluding third party document management provider costs.
- Costs judge may permit recovery in excess of the cap only if there is good reason and it was not reasonable to apply for variation under CPR 3.19(7).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment