GENIUS SPORTS TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED & Ors v SOFT CONSTRUCT (MALTA) LIMITED & Ors
The court ordered a bespoke disclosure regime, departing from the standard model, due to the real risk that relevant documents would be missed under standard processes, the absence of oppression, and the need for proportionality. The regime focuses on excluding only unequivocally irrelevant and privileged documents, with robust protection for confidential material, and is justified by the court's jurisdiction to direct otherwise under CPR 31.5(1)(a).
- Parties
- Claimant: Genius Sports Technologies Limited and Others; Defendant: Soft Construct (Malta) Limited and Others; Defendant: Ninth Defendant
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 October 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Case Management Conference Ruling
- Outcome
- Bespoke disclosure regime ordered in place of standard CPR regime.
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure, Case Management, Confidentiality, Jurisdiction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Genius Sports Technologies Limited and Others
Claimant
Soft Construct (Malta) Limited and Others
Defendant
Ninth Defendant
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Case Management Conference Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate disclosure regime for competition and intellectual property claims
- 2 Jurisdiction to order a bespoke disclosure regime
- 3 Protection of privileged and confidential material
Ratio Decidendi
The court ordered a bespoke disclosure regime, departing from the standard model, due to the real risk that relevant documents would be missed under standard processes, the absence of oppression, and the need for proportionality. The regime focuses on excluding only unequivocally irrelevant and privileged documents, with robust protection for confidential material, and is justified by the court's jurisdiction to direct otherwise under CPR 31.5(1)(a).
Court Disposition
Bespoke disclosure regime ordered in place of standard CPR regime.
Orders
- Each Producing Party to file and serve an affidavit identifying custodians, repositories, collections, and date ranges for electronic search by 12 October 2022.
- Receiving Parties to have 14 days to probe and discuss affidavit evidence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment